We can Denia He has proposed allocating 50% of the budget of each department to citizen participation so that the residents themselves can decide what works and services they need in their neighborhood. In this way, they seek that the decisions taken from the different municipal budgetary areas correspond to the real needs of citizens.
According to Podem Dénia, citizen participation is not limited to casting the vote at the polls, but it is about creating a participatory commitment in which politicians act as mere managers of the demands of the voters "to make their city a kinder place and not surrender their needs to mere electoral promises that, in most cases, are carried out only in part or are barely reflected in an electoral program».
Podem Dénia affirms that "citizens are the ones who best know the needs of their neighborhood", their streets, their surroundings, and they are the ones who can best decide how to allocate the public budget in works and services that result in the well-being and quality of life for all. For this reason, they consider it essential to give residents a more active and decisive role, and guarantee that their demands are binding.
In this sense, the training has underlined the importance of citizen participation in decision-making, as they consider it a fundamental instrument to strengthen democracy and guarantee that public policies correspond to the real needs and demands of citizens. In this way, Podem Dénia is committed to a more participatory public management, which allows residents to feel an active part of the decision-making process.
Good morning. I totally agree with Eve.
As always, politicians are looking for "whom to blame" custom implanted by the government of the Nation.
Councilors and other placed from all parties. Do your job! . Visit the neighborhoods of your City on a daily basis. Meet her! and you will know your needs, communicate with the neighborhood; are able to capture what is accurate. Of course, for that you have to have trained people. I do not belong to or militate in any party and from what I have lived, of those who act in the government or have acted before YOU CANNOT TRUST. The others remain to be seen, but they immediately become infected. Therefore I cannot and should not think that in Podem Denia, this qualified personnel does not exist. But with their vague proposal they make me doubt.
Greetings.
That is to say, I vote every four years so that those who govern because of the vote, submit to a vote what we want for Dénia in the following years. That is not so, my vote goes to a group because I like their proposals about what they will do in those four years; that they want to paint the streets green, because with my vote I give them the go-ahead, but then they should not paint it yellow because that is how it has been approved in a popular vote. If there is anything to change, then they should hire someone competent for that (for that I vote) and not consult again (you know: for tastes, colors)
The point is that the parties only agree a month before our elections.
It is a brainy question, of brains, not of voting.
That they want to stop doing their job, or that others do it for them; they do not see themselves capable of proposing solutions; think, and work for an optimal result?
It is about doing what is best for each neighborhood, and what is best for everyone. And "the best" has no ideology.
What is it about proposing and voting for us? Perfect, but then all the politicians to your house, you don't need them.
What should be done is a citizen consultation to prepare the budgets.
Ask citizens about the future location of the new Bus Station, what do they think about the construction of the FP Center in the port, propose the regulated "opening" of the center of Denia (for example, from Monday to Thursday from 9 a.m. to 19h), collect a study of proposals, talk about the need for a cinema, more bus stops and the implementation of more bus lines for the towns, a Theater-Auditorium and an office for citizen complaints to improve the management of the city hall.
In addition, a citizen voting point should be proposed, so that people can vote for what is voted for in the plenary sessions of the town hall.